Winds of hope on HIV/AIDS in Eastern Europe and Central Asia

February 20, 2018  BMJ

The announcement by UNAIDS that some 21 million people living with HIV are now on treatment uncovers an extraordinary achievement and one of the great global health milestones of this century.

It gives us hope that the other 15 million or so people living with HIV can also soon access antiretroviral treatment, and hope that we can begin to turn around the spiralling rates of HIV infection occurring in Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA). Much of the media coverage focused on the intransigence of the government of the Russian Federation to changing its prevention policies around HIV/AIDS, namely via the supply of clean needles and opioid substitution therapy (OST) such as methadone. And with the number of people living with HIV in Russia now officially exceeding 900,000 compared to 250,000 a decade ago, and people using drugs still representing over 40% of newly diagnosed cases, that criticism is fair.

However this focus also obscures the fact that in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, which has been much maligned over the past decade for its slowness in responding to the HIV/AIDS epidemic, we are now beginning to see strong hints that public health initiatives based on scientific evidence are taking on a legitimacy across the region.

On a political level we are seeing increased awareness and leadership, for example the Russian Federation government for the first time adopted a state HIV/AIDS strategy followed by an action plan 2017-2020.

There is growing national dialogue across sectors in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Moldova on the back of national multi-partner AIDS conferences held in both countries in 2016 and 2017. Very significantly, Kazakhstan has now successfully transitioned from external financing from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and malaria to cover the majority of costs for their AIDS response from domestic sources.

Truly encouraging too has been the decision by the Ukrainian cities of Kiev, Odessa, and Balsi in Moldova and Almaty in Kazakhstan to associate themselves as Fast-Track Cities committed to reaching the 90-90-90 treatment target by 2020, the aim of which is to ensure that, by 2020, at least 90% of people living with HIV know their status, 90% of all people diagnosed with HIV infection will receive sustained antiretroviral therapy, and 90% of all people receiving antiretroviral therapy will have viral suppression.

Finally, and hugely important, we are now seeing significant health system reforms in countries like Ukraine and Kazakhstan that are vital to responding to the AIDS and TB epidemics more effectively and efficiently.

This groundswell of change in the region has been building up for some time now and we are seeing the fruits of it beginning to emerge.

Quite remarkably, nine of the 12 EECA countries now implement national programmes around OST, with Uzbekistan currently considering its uptake. Russia and Turkmenistan are certainly isolated on this front, by not implementing a similar strategy.

Armenia and Belarus have now officially been declared by the WHO as having eliminated the transmission of HIV from mother to child.

Equally encouraging is the increase by 13% in antiretroviral treatment coverage across the region in the last two years. Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Georgia and Ukraine have already adopted a “Test and Treat” strategy and several more countries in EECA are currently pending approval.

Lastly and perhaps a strong indicator of commitment to respond to the epidemic across the region is the significant headway being made across the region to reduce the high prices of antiretroviral drugs. The positive steps being made in the region on HIV/AIDS provides genuine hope. We will need to build on these growing expectations if we are to successfully overcome the barriers that have come to define the epidemic in the EECA. Despite the progress, new cases and AIDS-related mortality continue to increase as a result of previous neglect and inadequate policies over the past fifteen years. Some 400 000 people do not know their HIV positive status, antiretroviral therapy coverage is still the lowest among any region of the world, and prevention programmes are poorly funded and fail to reach the majority of those vulnerable groups at high risk of contracting HIV, and who also continue to be stigmatizsed, criminalised, and often denied access to services.

The growing signs that we may be seeing perceptible changes in HIV/AIDS responses from governments across the EECA region is cause for hope for those at risk of and living with the disease. Those changes will definitely need to be predicated on respect for the human rights of all people to have access to health care if we are truly to change the trajectory of the HIV epidemic in EECA.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Health in the Soviet Union and in the post-Soviet space: from utopia to collapse and arduous recovery

September 30, 2017, The Lancet

“At least in those days, I had no rent and no heating bill to pay, I had free access to doctors, and the state would make sure my children are educated and in good health”, says Evguenia, a babouchka I spoke with recently in Moscow.

Health is one of the areas where nostalgia for the Soviet Union is still common among Russians and people living in countries in the post-Soviet space. Most Russian adults alive today witnessed the dramatic deterioration of health care in the 10 years after the end of the Soviet Union. These people have seen the social safety net provided by the Soviet system abruptly disintegrate, inequities grow sharply, and elderly, sick, and disabled people become left behind while the country painfully and erratically transitioned from a planned economy to capitalism. Another reason for the lingering nostalgia is the persistent perception that health care should be provided by the central government, with little or no responsibility on the part of the individual.

The Soviet Constitution of 1936 stated that citizens of the Soviet Union have the right to health protection ensured by free, qualified medical care in state institutions. In the years after the 1917 revolution, Russia created a centralised and integrated state health-care system based on concepts introduced by Nicolaï Semashko, the People’s Commissar for Public Health from 1918 to 1930. The health-care system relied on an extensive network of primary care clinics and specialised hospitals staffed by large numbers of doctors and health-care workers, and it provided universal coverage, accessible to everyone, even in the most remote parts of the country. The improvements in health care during the first half of the 20th century were quite remarkable, with life expectancy in the Soviet Union in the 1960s similar to that in the USA.

However, the system rapidly deteriorated in the 1970s. Reduced funding from the central government and increasing bureaucratic and economic inefficiencies resulted in inadequate availability of medical drugs and technologies, poorly maintained facilities, worsening quality of health care, and falling life expectancy.

The transition of health systems from the Soviet facility-based model to patient-centered and decentralised standards of care is far from complete. Throughout the region, national funding allocations are based on number of doctors and beds (rather than on outputs). For example, tuberculosis care in many countries in the post-Soviet space is still provided through a hospital-centric system, where patients are admitted to hospital for standard tuberculosis treatment; not only is this system costly and inefficient, it has contributed profoundly to the rapid increase in the incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in the region. Public health budgets barely cover the salaries of health-care staff. Drugs are often paid for out of pocket, and bribes are often a way to access better quality service. The private health insurance market is expanding among urban middle-class employees as this population increasingly turns to private health-care networks.

Another key feature of health care in the post-Soviet context has been the dominance of treatment and curative approaches, with little focus on prevention and public health. The fast spread of the HIV epidemic in the region is attributable in part to this vertical, provider-centred, treatment-oriented system with almost no cooperation with the non-governmental sector and grossly inadequate attention to prevention.

Nevertheless, there are also reasons to believe that change is possible, even in the face of the tremendous health challenges in the region. But change is down a long and arduous road. The many sources of resistance include health-care professionals themselves, corrupted intermediaries who have been taking advantage of the system, and political elites who are reluctant to change structures they have benefitted from, directly or indirectly. This is well illustrated by the bitterness that prevails with respect to the current efforts of the Ukrainian Government to achieve radical public health reforms in the country. Some enlightened politicians and health professionals do recognise that the current system is both ineffective and unsustainable, and that health outcomes in the region are falling behind the rest of the world. Ordinary people are beginning to recognise that the Soviet model no longer understands or serves their health needs.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

Remarks given at the 40th Programme Coordinating Board meeting of UNAIDS in Geneva, June 27,  2017

Thank you Mr Chair.

Thank you Michel for your report and contextual analysis. Your words and those of the First Lady of Panama, strongly resonate for countries in Eastern Europe and central Asia.

Eight out of 12 countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, including the largest one, have been reporting a continuous increase in the number of new HIV infections and on an epidemic that continues to grow by about 10% per year.

Also of significant concern is the steady increase in the number of HIV-TB co-infections. The number of people living with HIV among newly diagnosed TB cases has doubled in the last five years; HIV-TB co-infection in the region, often means co-infection with resistant forms of TB.

Despite the acknowledged concentrated character of the epidemic, testing and access to prevention programs remains low among vulnerable groups of the population. Harm reduction programs for example, reach less than 10% of PWID in the region. Opioid maintenance therapy is now part of the national strategy in nine of the twelve countries of EECA but remains illegal in three.

Access to antiretroviral treatment also remains low, of less than 25% of those estimated to be in need, although these figures have been significantly increasing in several countries in the region in the last three years. The region has conducted strong and effective programs to prevent vertical transmission of HIV.

Stigma is high and many obstacles of societal, cultural, legislative and political nature remain. We still have much to do to ensure that the tremendous programmatic knowledge we have about how to respond to concentrated epidemics is more effectively translated into national strategies.

As a Special Envoy, I have conducted high level advocacy and dialogue to promote country-specific strategic priorities to fast-track the AIDS response. I focused on addressing the needs of key populations and on the issue of sustainable financing for the fight AIDS, TB, DR-TB and hepatitis in a region where funding from international sources has been diminishing or discontinued. More specifically, I also worked with local and international partners to ensure uninterrupted access to HIV and DR-TB treatment for people living in the conflict areas of Eastern Ukraine and for labor migrants in Central Asia.

It has been an honor to serve under Secretary General Ban Ki Moon whose commitment to the fight against HIV/AIDS and to the health of the most vulnerable I had learned and respected also throughout my years at the Global Fund. I welcome SG Guterres’s commitment to human rights and development.

I would like to particularly thank Michel for his support; thank the regional and country teams of UNAIDS, WHO, UNDP, UNODC, UNFPA and UNICEF for a truly excellent cooperation; thank the governments, civil society and community organizations in the region for a trustful relationship throughout these few years.

We need to maintain the international leverage and dialogue in the region.

I remain strongly positive, recognizing the progress that is being made, having faith in the wonderful people of the region and remaining confident that if we do what needs to be done, the fight against AIDS in the region will ultimately be won.

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

The Shifting Diplomacy around Migration, HIV/AIDS and Tuberculosis in Central Asia

March 23, 2017, The Huffington Post 

Central Asia and the Russian Federation face a major intra-regional migration flow, home, as it is, to one of the largest labor migration corridors in the world, with hundreds of thousands of migrant workers moving from Central Asian countries to the Russian Federation and to Kazakhstan each year.[1] This migration flow of further concern given migrants’ increased vulnerability and poor access to HIV and TB prevention and care in host countries.

The Eastern Europe and Central Asia region is home to the fastest growing HIV epidemic in the world. Over the last five years, the number of new HIV diagnoses has more than doubled in Eastern Europe. In Russia alone, it is estimated that over a million people are living with HIV compared to around 250 000 a decade ago.[2] Nine Eastern European and Central Asian countries are also among WHO`s global list of Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) high burden countries.[3]

In Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and also Armenia, substantial parts of the population are migrating to neighboring Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation for work purposes. Migration is clearly recognized as a risk factor for TB, MDR-TB[4] and HIV[5]. High mobility and seasonal migration patterns associated with poor living and working conditions, are contributing factors towards increasing migrants’ vulnerability and exposure to HIV and TB in the host country where they often experience significant barriers in accessing healthcare services.

For instance, over sixty percent of people who have been detected as HIV-positive in the last three years in Armenia, have, at one point, migrated to the Russian Federation for work. Non-governmental organizations in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan report evidence of a growing number of HIV infections among spouses of men who return from labor migration.

A recent report from the Central Tuberculosis Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences indicated that the proportion of TB and MDR-TB among migrants is 2.5 higher than in the general population.[6] Reduced access to health services and the fear of deportation if diagnosed with TB and HIV means that many diagnoses are being hidden or delayed.

Today, only a minority of HIV-positive migrants in the Russian Federation is accessing antiretroviral therapy (ART), while about 10 per cent of migrants are being tested for HIV and TB.[7] Despite pre-departure screening practices in the region for those requesting work authorization, many labor migrants are entering Kazakhstan and the Russian Federation without proper documentation in as much as there are visa-free travel agreements between countries. Scarce data on migrants’ health is an additional barrier to understanding how this group is affected by these diseases.

Notwithstanding, despite the barriers, there are also signs of cautious progress.

In the last few years, Kazakhstan has changed its policies, now ensuring access to full TB treatment for migrants irrespective of their legal status – and to MDR-TB treatment until the point that patients become sputum-negative. Although these clearly are progressive policies, many problems remain, including the conditions under which patients returning to their country of origin have to continue treatment to the end and the complexities of the patient referral system.

Under the auspices of the Kazakh Ministry of Health, with the support of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, bilateral agreements are being negotiated between Kazakhstan-Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan-Tajikistan on the access of migrant workers to TB care and treatment.

There is also progress in the Russian Federation around policies of both screening and requiring health insurance for migrants prior to entry on its territory. These policies allow for access to care of documented migrants at the site where they have registered for work. The downside to this measure however, is that many people are, however, emigrating for short period of times outside the registration system.

To reverse the rising HIV and MDR TB epidemics, the region will need to move forward on a number of fronts:

Firstly, there must be a halt to the deportation of migrants based on health status in the countries where it is still in practice. Currently, in too many instances in the region, a diagnosis of TB, MDR-TB or HIV means deportation, a practice that is widely known to be ineffective to public health, violate human rights, and may lead to drug resistant forms of infection.

Secondly, the region needs to ensure migrants’ have access to HIV services, including ART, and to full course TB/MDR-TB treatment in the host country. It will be vital that a funding mechanism be established to cover HIV and TB treatment costs for migrants who choose to stay in the host country to be treated.

Lastly, national and regional responses around infectious diseases like HIV and TB urgently need to be reviewed to include migrants as a vulnerable group.

It is no exaggeration to say that unless we see collective movement around the above fronts, all the ingredients of a brewing regional public health crisis will continue to bubble away.

—————————————

[1] IOM (2015) Mapping on Irregular Migration in Central Asia 2014, Astana, 2015.

[2] Unaids (2016) Prevention Gap Report.

[3] WHO (2016) Global Tuberculosis Report 2015.

[4] Dara M et al. (2012). Minimum package for cross-border TB control and care in the WHO European region: a Wolfheze consensus statement. The European Respiratory Journal, 40(5):1081-90. Published online 2012 May 31. Available at:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3485571/

[5] Unaids (2014) The Gap Report.

[6]Demikhova O, Nechaeva O (2016) Access of Migrant to Services on Early Detection, Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment of Tuberculosis and Tuberculosis Associated with HIV Infection, Moscow, (In Russian : Вопросы доступа мигрантов к мероприятиям по раннему выявлению, диагностике, профилактике и лечению туберкулеза и туберкулеза, сочетанного с ВИЧ-инфекцией в странах СНГ) Available at : http://mednet.ru/images/stories/files/CMT/migranty.pdf

[7] Demikhova O, Nechaeva O (2016) Access of Migrant to Services on Early Detection, Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment of Tuberculosis and Tuberculosis Associated with HIV Infection, Moscow, (In Russian : Вопросы доступа мигрантов к мероприятиям по раннему выявлению, диагностике, профилактике и лечению туберкулеза и туберкулеза, сочетанного с ВИЧ-инфекцией в странах СНГ) Available at : http://mednet.ru/images/stories/files/CMT/migranty.pdf

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS

WOMEN’S HEALTH AND RIGHTS, MORE THAN EVER THREATENED

The commitments made by the governments to support access to treatment and care, defense of human rights, fight against inequality, discrimination, vulnerability and violence – and the values that underpin them – are always measured in the light of health and women’s rights.  We are all reminded of this in celebrating women today, on the occasion of International Women’s Day.

By placing women’s health and rights at the heart of the Sustainable Development goals adopted in September 2015, the international community recognizes their power for development. Despite the incredible progress made in recent years in global health, progress for women’s health remain insufficient.

– HIV / AIDS is the leading cause of death for women aged 15-44 worldwide and tuberculosis is among the top five causes of women death in this age bracket in low- and middle-income countries.

– Every week 7,500 women and girls aged 15-24 years, are infected with HIV. 60% of new HIV infections among 15-24 years old are contracted by girls and women. In HIV high burden countries, 80% of newly infected adolescents are girls.

– 35% of women worldwide have experienced intimate partner violence or non-partner sexual violence.

– 225 million women who do not wish to become pregnant, do not have access to modern contraception and family planning means. Every year, 74 million of unwanted pregnancies are counted in developing countries, which will result in 36 million of abortions and among them 21 million are unsafe generating about 13% of maternal deaths.

By reinstating the Global Gag Rule 101 on January 22, President Donald Trump directs the Secretary of State, the Administrator of USAID and the Secretary of Health and Human Services to take all necessary actions, to the extent allowable by law, to ensure that federal US public resources will not fund any organization or program supporting or participating in the management of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.

Consequently, any non-governmental US organization financed by federal funds, not only for family planning but also for global health, HIV / AIDS and maternal and child health may not provide nor promote services relevant to abortion or providing abortion as a method of family planning, nor inform nor advocate for such measures on both US and foreign soil. This prohibition applies to the entire activity of these organizations regardless of their source of funding. Should these organizations not comply with these prescriptions, they would lose all the resources from federal US funds, including those dedicated to the provision of condoms or modern contraceptives for women.

Those restrictions deny the major effects of sexual and reproductive health on women’s health, global health and development.

By increasing unwanted pregnancies, unsafe abortions, and maternal and child deaths, this decision endanger years of hard-won gains, not only from reproductive and maternal health, but also from the fight against HIV / AIDS and other sexually transmitted infections, as well as child health.

When a woman is able to choose the number of pregnancies, spacing between two births, she can better manage her resources and give her children better nutrition, better health and a better education. Giving children a better chance to live better is the right way to fight poverty.

Such restrictions alter the living forces of development. They destroy entire sections of global and community health services, expertise, know-how, and partnerships that are so difficult to build on.

Finally and even more severely, by limiting women’s rights, autonomy, ability to economically empower themselves and to support the development of their communities, they help to keep countries and populations in poverty.

The international community cannot ignore the consequences of these provisions and their impact on global health and development. It must mobilize any additional resources to continuously and sustainably provide all women and girls with the indispensable services that guarantee health, autonomy and rights.

 

Laurent VIGIER, former advisor of the French President, Jacques Chirac for International Summits and multilateral instruments – Chair of Friends of the Global Fund Europe Board

Heidemarie WIECZOREK-ZEUL, Former German Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development – Vice-Chair of Friends of the Global Fund Europe Board in charge of GERMANY

Charles GOERENS, former Minister of International Cooperation and Humanitarians Affairs, Member of the European Parliament – Vice-Chair of Friends of the Global Fund Europe Board in charge of The European Institutions – Luxembourg and Belgium

Stefano VELLA, Director of the Center for Global Health, Italian National Health Institute – Vice-Chair of Friends of the Global Fund Europe Board in charge of ITALY

Michèle BARZACH, former French Minister of Health – Member of Friends of the Global Fund Europe Board

Michel KAZATCHKINE, UN Secretary General Special Envoy on HIV/AIDS in Eastern Europe and Central Asia  – Member of Friends of the Global Fund Europe Board

Andris PIEBALGS, Former European Commissioner for Development – Member of Friends of the Global Fund Europe Board

Share and Enjoy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Delicious
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Add to favorites
  • Email
  • RSS